On 2 Apr, 16:33, "adman" wrote:
Second Law of Thermodynamics supports the supernatural model of origins.

What evidence do you have for this statement?

1. There is no natural means to increase usable energy in a closed system.

This is incorrect, the definition of a closed system in thermodynamics
is one that can exchange energy but not matter with its surroundings.

Therefore the energy content of a closed system can vary in either
direction depending on what the state of its surroundings may be at
any time.

2. The universe is decreasing in usable energy.

Only because it is an isolated system that is not in equilibrium.

3. Therefore, the initial energy of the universe must have originated
supernaturally.

You have been adamant that no one can provide evidence for what
existed before the universe as we know it began.

How about you now provide the evidence that supports your contention
that the universe had a supernatural beginning.

Make sure that it is sound scientific evidence.

4. The creation model conforms to the data.

Evolution proposes only natural explanations.

The whole of science proposes only natural explanations.

Therefore, evolution contradicts a natural law.

Which natural law is evolution supposedly contradicting?

Models that contradict data are unscientific.
Therefore, evolution as a model of origins is unscientific

And as your "model" is not supported by the available data will you
accept it is not scientific?

http://www.mbbc.us/creation/presentation.htm