"Juan R." González-Ãlvarez wrote on Wed, 02 Apr 2008 12:35:26 +0200:
The conclusion is again that gravitational interactions are *not*
retarded by c (as one would wait). Several mistakes of Carlip paper
(section on gravitation) are highlighted.
I mean that gravitational interactions are *not* retarded by c (as one
would wait in basis to recent works proving that electromagnetic
interactions are not retarded indeed).
--
http://canonicalscience.org/en/misce...guidelines.txt