On Feb 28, 4:55 am, bz wrote:
wrote in news:96052594-f543-4e75-8e91-2bc1d511ba45
@j28g2000hsj.googlegroups.com:
Just got a web site up and going and enough content is there now for
people to judge its validity.I just got someone to tell me the theory
is invalid but I need more opinions before I go discrediting the
theory.
Many of you must have seen it but most have not really said much about
it.
Theory deals with the idea that the sort of time dilation that occurs
with gravity can also contract matter.
1) NO where on your site do you clearly state exactly what your 'theory'
is.
Actually I have no idea it just seams to lead to so many other
theories that I cant even decide if I can even give it a name or do I
need names and how many.If you don't believe me wait till I get the
rest of its contents up.
2) the 'three column' format on your 'theory' page is a PITA to read.
3) You need to have someone proof read your text. You relied on a spell
checker and have the wrong word, correctly spelled, in several places.
4) If you look at the Roche Limit and Swartzchild Radius for black holes
the size needed to slow light to the speed you require, you will see that
neither the barn, the pole nor any nearby observers, nor their planet would
survive long enough to make any observations.
Actually that would be true but its only an analogy a much lesser
amount of gravity would work but then the amount of time dilation is
also less and would not show the effect as clearly.Suppose you could
argue for 2 tiny black holes that at the center of the barn that would
slow the speed of light to something more extreme like .001 cm a
second at its very center and we just average the speed to 10 seconds
over the whole length. With hypothetical stuff you got lots of
possibles and can go to ridiculous extremes.
But yes if you could somehow keep the time dilating component of
gravity without the gravity then setting up a real experiment would in
principle be more possible but it may not be possible to have time
dilation of this sort without gravity.Its not clear if gravity could
be caused by the very time dilations it causes i.e. 2 sides of the
same coin.
But really no ones going to be able to actually do this experiment
with an actual barn but you might in principle be able to do another
one similar to the way that the experiment that led to the Shapiro
effect was done.
The slower time dose the
------------------does---???
Good point.
contracting not the gravity. The theory claims you cant contract
matter without also expanding the surrounding space when gravitational
time dilation is the case.The theory dose an exceptional job of giving
-----same mistake. The theory seems to be a dose of something. 
----
alternative explanations for the creation of a universe to even an
alternative mechanism for gravitational binding energy and even
reversing entropy and more.And why I got so convinced about the theory
is it gives a number of testable predictions and you will note that
the first part of the site looks at one thats a bit difficult to do in
reality but gets the idea across in the simplest way.
I really want some opinions.
Opinions are like noses, everyone has one. But not all should be expressed
in public.
www.alttheories.com
Broken links on first page.
I suggest you readhttp://www.apa.org/journals/features/psp7761121.pdf
Like I said I just got it up and then I got a bit impatient about
finding out more if the theory was any good or really bad after
another poster claimed it was a waste of time.Only so much point to
worrying about proper spelling on a really flawed theory.
But these news groups are great for testing out different ways of
explaining problems to see what works best.Even a good theory if it
cant be clearly explained so that both experts and hobbyist can
understand it, will probably go nowhere.
This is really nice of you to help its well appreciated thanks.
Got any ideas on what its a theory of.
Dale
--
bz
please pardon my infinite ignorance, the set-of-things-I-do-not-know is an
infinite set.
remove ch100-5 to avoid spam trap