On Feb 25, 10:24 pm, "Paul B. Andersen"
wrote:
tantal skrev:



On Feb 25, 9:31 pm, "Paul B. Andersen"
wrote:
tantal skrev:

On Feb 25, 11:18 am, "Paul B. Andersen"
wrote:
caliber wrote:
On Feb 24, 3:51 am, Randy Poe wrote:
On Feb 23, 6:07 pm, caliber wrote:
On Feb 23, 11:58 pm, Randy Poe wrote:
On Feb 23, 5:54 pm, caliber wrote:
On Feb 23, 11:31 pm, Randy Poe wrote:
On Feb 23, 5:08 pm, caliber wrote:
On Feb 23, 10:57 pm, Randy Poe wrote:
On Feb 23, 1:59 pm, caliber wrote:
many years thay been able to send satellites
orbiting tha moon very closely
tha not close enuff
giv me a break,
you can see cars and shoes from space
throo google earth,
No you can't, not from space.
are you saying that tha earth we see from
google is not pictures taken from space?
Not if it is showing "cars and shoes".
if you say you cant see cars and walking
people thro google earth you are a blind
man or a liar
and if you register, they give you even higher
resolution
but anyhow, they pretend getting images
of objects on earth from satelites with
cm resolution
Where do they pretend that? Can you link me to
an image with cm resolution, that claims it is
from space?
you can link yourself many places, they say not me
No they don't.
There, that was easy to disprove.
Guess how you could prove me wrong?
fine, tell me than what are thay doing in space
all years long if not watching earth or somthin
also, what is tha highest resolution do you
think they can get
Commercially? A meter perhaps. I was reading a web
page today that offered resolution down to 3 inches
(7.5 cm) but that was from aircraft.
- Randy
you are even more wrong now than you been before
thanks
they imposibly can have so many aircrafts to
so many walking people
now, if you clearly can see a car from space,
than a lunar base station from a satellite orbiting
tha moon will have even higher resolution
becus tha satellites orbit tha moon closer to
tha moon than they orbit tha earth
tha moon has lower gravity fool
so tha moon resolution should be 10 times higher
http://tinyurl.com/2c4eofhttp://www....unches/mission...
--
Paul
http://home.c2i.net/pb_andersen/
finally a nice answer, thanks
but still im not confinced,
tha image is at best 400x300 pixels, and easy to fake
even my litle sister has a camera with better resolution
Any image can be faked.
If you are one of those cranks who believe NASA is faking its images,
nothing can convince you about the opposite.

--
Paul

http://home.c2i.net/pb_andersen/

contrarily i am not an anbuliver

So why are you anbuliving that the picture shows what it says?

i am just wondering, that all they have after all these
years, a single 400x300x 8bit gray scale resolution

this is too easy

impossible that they dont have more many

Of course they have many images of the landing sites.http://www.cmf.nrl.navy.mil/clementi...lunar_orbiter/
You will find all the landing sites in these pictures.
But what do you expect you should see?
Footsteps? :-)

--
Paul

http://home.c2i.net/pb_andersen/

can you somthin strange in this picture?
http://www.hq.nasa.gov/alsj/a12/AS12-49-7213HR.jpg