On Feb 23, 8:36 pm, wrote:
On Feb 23, 7:15 pm, Eric Gisse wrote:

Now you have to explain why the masses of the planets as determined
through Kepler's 3rd law is wrong,...
I didn't say that in this thread.

Well. you didn't answer in the other threads, so now I'm giving you
a
seventh chance.

Doesn't the Equivalence Principle imply that a satellite's orbit isn't
a function of its mass?

Where am I going wrong?

By the way, Eric, why are you failing to graduate this spring?

Love,
Jenny