On Feb 20, 9:53*am, Eric Gisse wrote:
On Feb 19, 10:38 pm, "Y.y.Porat" wrote:

2
they could not understand that
*NO MASS NO REAL PHYSICS !!

*(which should be one of the basics of physics
and a more powerful 'lithmus paper' to examine
quickly if a theory makes physics sense
or jsut a fairy tale *! *(spelling for 'tale ' *taile ?? )
ie nonsens physics
anyway
*years later *even Gisse * &Co will get it
but he wil claime that that is** his** innovation.. *(:-)

ATB
Y.Porat
----------------------

What a blithering idiot. You still don't get that E = mc^2 isn't valid
for moving objects.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

-----------------
imbecil parrot
so what is that c there??

have you heared about
INTRINSIC MOVEMENT ??

doe s a little ****er like you what toteachme
about the structure of matter and energy
and mass problems ??
just whipe out the milk from your stupid arrogant face

What are you even trying to say? Your gibberish has improved - nobody
knows what the hell you are talking about.





ATB
Y.Porat- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

----------------
of course you cant understand
you cant understand anything that is not in your textbook

(what has all that got to do with my English crooky??)

and your parrot teachers
(may be the white bears of Alaska ??)
what might be intrinsic movement
inside the Atom that gives it its internal energy
2
tell your bears of Alaska that
ENERGY IS MASS IN MOVEMENT
no matter how you turn it around
3
satrt understanding physics before mathematics
got it little 24 years parrot??

(generally young people are less parrots then you are
they have an open criticising mind)

Y.Porat
--------------------------------