View Single Post
  #8  
Old February 21st 08 posted to sci.physics.relativity
Jerry
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,382
Default Uncle Al reply to Tom Roberts

On Feb 19, 9:28*am, Tom Roberts wrote:
Juan R. González-Álvarez wrote:
On the thread about gravity at molecular level,
on sci.physics.research
Tom Roberts did some
comments on Uncle Al post. Uncle Al reply has been


"Yours is a statement of profound ignorance in all of its parts."
Cannot agree more!


Apparently you missed the fact that Uncle Al did not answer the question
(he responded with an incoherent spew of jargon indistinguishable from
nonsense).

Insults from Uncle Al are of no account.


I've never understood why Uncle Al seems to be so respected by members
of the sci.physics.* newsgroups. His ability to spew out superficially
impressive jargon fails to hide the fact that he is really not any
sort
of expert in relativity. Chemistry, yes, especially organic
chemistry...
but physics??? He lost any residual respect I might have had for him
when he started the "Toodling near lightspeed - NOT!" thread:
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.p...eddb852dcab01e

I thought he was joking about molecules racemizing near the speed of
light, but it turned out that he was dead serious.

The only explanation that I've been able to come up with, is some sort
of belief that "the enemy of my enemy is my friend."

The way that Uncle Al tears into the anti-relativity crackpots can
indeed be amusing.

So yes, Uncle Al is "on the right side." The question is, do we WANT
him on our side? Personally, I'd rather not.

Jerry
Ads
 

Cheap Car Insurance - Loans - Pacotes TurĂ­sticos - Bad Credit Mortgages - Advertising