Uncle Al reply to Tom Roberts
Dear Juan R. González-Álvarez:
On Feb 19, 9:26*am, "Juan R." González-Álvarez
wrote:
Tom Roberts wrote on Tue, 19 Feb 2008 09:28:02 -0600:
Juan R. González-Álvarez wrote:
On the thread about gravity at molecular level, on
sci.physics.research
Tom Roberts did some
comments on Uncle Al post. Uncle Al reply has been
"Yours is a statement of profound ignorance in all
of its parts." Cannot agree more!
Apparently you missed the fact that Uncle Al did not
answer the question (he responded with an incoherent
spew of jargon indistinguishable from nonsense).
Insults from Uncle Al are of no account.
What insults on the extract i reproduced? Ignorance
is not an insult just a mind state.
You took a quote out of context. You made a post directly aimed at
both Tom Roberts and Uncle Al. The ignorance is yours to cure.
Ignorance can be eliminated by injecting some
knowledge.
Yes, please.
Since you agree with him, perhaps YOU can answer
the question I asked. If not, that says far more
about you than about me, and our relative states
of "ignorance".
I did a similar mistake in the past discussing with
you both here and in sci.physics.research newsgroup.
So you snipe and run, and never stand on whatever "facts" you fling in
people's faces?
But i usually follow point ((5)) of guidelines
linked below now.
How nice. Follow your own philosophy now.
...
Of course, some of your post are also really good.
I have nothing to add to those also.
Yet you feel competent to lean towards one over the other? I think
you well and truly have walked into the wake between two mud
wrestlers, and will at least get soiled, and will most likely end up
having difficulty proceeding further. Uncle Al could not understand
and answer the challenge, but you seem to feel you can.
This should be fun to watch.
David A. Smith
|