On Feb 19, 5:26 pm, "Juan R." González-Álvarez
wrote:
Tom Roberts wrote on Tue, 19 Feb 2008 09:28:02 -0600:

Juan R. González-Álvarez wrote:
On the thread about gravity at molecular level, on
sci.physics.research
Tom Roberts did some
comments on Uncle Al post. Uncle Al reply has been

"Yours is a statement of profound ignorance in all of its parts."
Cannot agree more!

Apparently you missed the fact that Uncle Al did not answer the question
(he responded with an incoherent spew of jargon indistinguishable from
nonsense).

Insults from Uncle Al are of no account.

What insults on the extract i reproduced? Ignorance is not an insult just
a mind state.

Ignorance can be eliminated by injecting some knowledge.

Since you agree with him, perhaps YOU can answer the question I asked.
If not, that says far more about you than about me, and our relative
states of "ignorance".

I did a similar mistake in the past discussing with you both here and in
sci.physics.research newsgroup.

But i usually follow point ((5)) of guidelines linked below now.

Guidelines are one of the reasons which i have not replied many of your
last postings checking "Yours is a statement of profound ignorance in all
of its parts."

Of course, some of your post are also really good. I have nothing to add
to those also.

--
I followhttp://canonicalscience.org/en/miscellaneouszone/guidelines.txt

i no mind callin people names

i call gladly anybody names, as long as
i have somthin ta put on it,

but you put nothen

so you must be a gay, a selfestablished relativity
baboon callin people names without putting somthin
on it

i learn nothen from you

you are insignificant

and uncle al is not an uncle, dont let his name fool you