On Feb 18, 4:34*pm, pmb wrote:
On Feb 18, 3:12*am, Eric Gisse wrote:

On Feb 17, 10:42 pm, "Y.Porat" wrote:

[...]

Why is it so difficult for you to understand that E=mc^2 is a limiting
case?

Dear Eric

I don't understand this comment. What do you mean when you say that
"E=mc^2 is a limiting case?" Thank you.

Pete

---------------
eric is unable to do some reading between the lines:

it is not only an abstract limit case!
it has some other conclusions :

if E=mc^2 for the photon
it means that the photon CAN move at c !
and a firther conclusion:

the photon is an exception cace to the rule that
no mass can reach c
(the mass of the photon can reach c as an exception case)

and even an additional insight :
THERE IS JUST ONE KIND OF MASS!
no matter how youcall it
just one kind of mass

all the 'other masses' were an invension of
amthematiciance who didt undersand the masic of physics
and could not grasp tha teach physics formula of eqaution
has its limits of validatio
and they could not immagine that the rule
of
no mass canreach c doe snot include the mass
of the photon
2
they could not understand that
NO MASS NO REAL PHYSICS !!

(which should be one of the basics of physics
and a more powerful 'lithmus paper' to examine
quickly if a theory makes physics sense
or jsut a fairy tale ! (spelling for 'tale ' taile ?? )
ie nonsens physics
anyway
years later even Gisse &Co will get it
but he wil claime that that is** his** innovation.. (:-)

ATB
Y.Porat
----------------------