On Feb 16, 11:08*pm, "
wrote:
On Feb 16, 1:16*pm, "Robert J. Kolker" wrote:

wrote:
On Feb 16, 8:12 am, Peter wrote:

Hi! Is it correct to say that work is a form of energy? At least that
is what the work-energy theorem seems to assert.

* *Yes it is. Yes, but what the mathemetical theorem spewers
* *don't seem to understand about work, is that most often
* *it is not workable energy.

What does this mean. Work, Energy is a quantity whose unit is force X
distance.

* *It means what's it's always meant.
* *Idiot scientists should stick ro studying Quantum Mechanics,
* *rather than energy. Since photons are like most
* *in the field of energy. They are -ons, rather than energy.





Bob Kolker- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

-------------------
before you speak about idiots
speak about yourself
because you are not only an idiot
you are a crook as well
the same as the clergy crooks hundreds of years ago

1
you say that photons are the main in the force field
so
that is the first certificate that you are
an ignorant pompous physicist
because the truth is that you understand nothing
about the real process of forces
AND YOU PRETEND TO TEACH OTHERS
ABOUT WHAT YOU HAVE NOT DONT UNDERSTAND
TO SCRACH.

photons are not the main in the force field
a physical entity that moves in straight lines
can never be an attraction agent!!

the main actor there is something unknown yet
that moves IN CURVED LINES !!

got it **** head and **** human sciences !???

2
to the op post
i would say that
work is a result of energy
3
energy is mass in movement !!
exactly as in macrocosm

E=mc^2

m there i s * not* 'relativistic mass'
it is the only mass that exists !!
got it crooky ??
4
QM is not yet the final solution for physics
there was physics before it (as it is)
and there will be physics AFTER IT (as it is now !!)

got it crooky ??
so just blow down a bit you pompous ego
because you are not impressing anyone
except yourself and your stupid thru believers

Y.Porat
--------------------------