"wugi" wrote in message
...
| "Androcles"
|
|
| | Does it contract or does it not? Lorentz says it does and AE accepted
| |
| | No it doesn't and no Lorentz doesn't.
|
| No it doesn't and yes Lorentz does.
| The crank clearly stated that it was pressure from the aether on the
| molecules in the direction of motion that caused the contraction.
|
| That's what a third party system will conclude about the moving object.
It's
| not what Peri asked: the moving object detects nothing particular about
| itself. Please read questions.
|
| You've obviously never read anything the crank Lorentz wrote.
|
| Please read texts.

The crazy cranks Lorentz and Fitzgerald said the contraction is real and
applies to the ruler doing the measuring too.
Don't tell me to read it when I have read it. YOU go and read the
papers, you ****headed little twerp.