Bosons and force; the Feynman diagram
On Feb 9, 10:17*am, "Y.Porat" wrote:
On Feb 9, 4:26*pm, "Autymn D. C." wrote:
On Feb 9, 12:11*am, "Y.Porat" wrote:
it is eather me or you that are idiots
i was not talking about elements born from each other
i was talking about :
FORCE MESSENGERS!!
*so i appligize if i was nor clear enough
so
no **force messenger** can be bigger than its mother
(that * * sent it *as a messenger)
iow
no ****en Boson can be 90 times bigger than say
a Proton that sent it to attract anything
i hope i made myself clearer now
as celar as the sun at the midd day
that only idiots *and mathematicians that
consider themselves physicists * *cannot see it
A quark nor nucleòn is not a bosòn.
The heaviest bosòns, Z\0 and W±, obviosely don't come from baruòns at
rest. *So your complaint is a strawman.
*those bosons come from what ??
did you ever found them in their ****natural envirinment****?
"did.. found" is illiterate gibberish
Why--do you find chickens and poodles in their natural environment?
or may bwe in a huge accelerator -** that has nothing to do **with
Protons or neutrons ??
how nothing? They start with protòns so they can't not end with
nucleonics. The W\± and Z\0 are transitions between heavier quarks;
the mass-energy is already there. For leihter particula, they are
only virtual bosòns--that is, subintegral quanta which conserve kemic
reactions by mathematic loops between forbidden regions of action.
2
i am not complaining
No, you're not a gerund.
you shoud complain that you are parrotong about something
that has nothing to do with any attraction force
except the connection with *crooks and suckers ...
Yet you still cannot prove tham. I already told you how to attract
with beachball-like tosses. And in my other posts I proved thas motes
are nearly-infinitely big, so their field can grab other fields in any
direction and extent, which is unlike your analog of two neutral
bodies and two hupervolic ejecta which can't even be attracted to
former bodies. That is, you use a circular argument to deny
attraction of the former by denire the attraction of the latter.
-Aut
|