The patent applicants that Einstein reviewed.
On Feb 11, 6:57 pm, Jeffâ˜*Relf wrote:
Einstein came up with “ e == m * c^2 â€
In Einstein’s (or whoever the author was) 1905 paper on relativity, he
derived (E = m c^2 / sqrt(1 – v^2 / c^2)) through a series of gross
mathematical errors. This means he knew the answer before hand.
Einstein was merely a nitwit, a plagiarist, and a liar.
and General Relativity,
The only way to derive the field equations is through the quantity
misbelieved to be a Lagrangian pulled out of Hilbert’s own *ss. After
all, Hilbert did present the field equations at Goettingen five days
before Einstein’s plagiarized presentation in Berlin. This once again
made Einstein a plagiarist.
not Poincare ( nor Lorentz ).
Well, Larmor was the author of the Lorentz transform based on the
ground-breaking work of the Voigt transform. However, I think it was
Lorentz who first derived (E = m c^2 / sqrt(1 – v^2 / c^2)). Please
correct me if I am wrong.
Instrinsically, objectively ( i.e. not subjectively ),
the cosmos is most obviously 4 dimensional,
Well, I disagree. According to the inverse square law of gravity, the
cosmos is the three-dimensional space with time to be the ruler to
describe how an event evolves in this three-dimensional space called
the cosmos. shrug
yet Quantum Mechanics can't explain it ! how sad.
There is no sadness about any discovery or yet discovered.
The SI length is the same as the SI time length,
only the ( maser maxima ) count is different.
Even the SI unit of mass could, at least in theory,
be a count of maser ( or atom laser ) maxima.
shrug
Einstein's best teachers may have been
the patent applicants that he reviewed.
You mean the victims of Einstein’s plagiarism. Yes, Einstein was a
nitwit, a plagiarist, and a liar.
|