Altruon Zardephax ha scritto nel messaggio
CUT

I hope that Reanhy is not a believer, a theist, christians and so on

I wanted to add to my previous message, the following.

Knowledge is something that humans are doing from ever. Knowledge is a good
system to survive in our environment.

I appreciate what you said about knowledge and how it is important for our
life.
Science and techonology are very important. Our knowledge nowadays is ONLY
science. Philosophy is NOTHING!!

Before science we used philosophy. But philosophy didn't care about
experiment, mathematics, observation.

Philosophy used to be a mere reasoning. Philosophy was the ability to
duscuss about a subject.

SCIENCE is very different. We use observation, experiment, mathematics and
so on.

Epistemology(how we know: theory of knowledge, gnoseology) exist, and
neuroscience and physics (science in genaral) do that.

Nowadays we have a "theory of knowledge" based on science, on observation,
on experiment, on mathematics.

We can say as well that nowadays(I mean from 1700 on) we have replaced
philosophy(mere reasoning) with SCIENCE (observation, experiment,
mathematics).

We have to remind about Giordano Bruno (1500), Galileo Galilei, Francis
Bacon and so on.
Philosophers that used to indicate NATURE as the real world, the world that
a "lover of knowledge" MUST investigate.

That was because in 1400 old Greek culture was translated in Latin, so they
discovered greek art, mathematics, science, and so on.

They discovered that old Greek loved nature and investigated that(see Greek
scientists).

So, Giordano Bruno, Galileo Galileo, began to study nature using the old
greek culture as background. Before the background was Church culture
BIBLE))

Philosophy is something for believers, theists, christians, muslims, jewish
))
I mean philosophy as a mere reasoning without using experiment, observation,
mathematics and so on.

We do not need to change too much terms. Epistemology(the theory of
knowledge) exist nowadays, and that is the scientific method. And
"philosophy of science" is the analysis to see how science works, in a
sociological way, in a psychological way.

The problem remain religion
And religious like philosophy, and like to put in European Constitution that
our origin are religious origin)

That's the problem.

I remind to everybody that philosophy is a MERE REASONING. Science use
observation, experiment, mathematics and so on.

I hope that this is a good difference to choose science to a "mere
reasoning".
But believers like a "mere reasoning" and not science)


Regards,
Franco