"xxein" wrote in message
...
On Jan 31, 7:20 pm, wrote:
Look at the first published "authors" and their "papers", you are in
for a (big) chuckle:

http://www.jgponline.co.cc/

xxein: On first glance it looks the same as the mumbo-jumbo offered
by the standard archives. One is an opinion relative to the consensus
and one is not. But the consensus is just the present opinion. It
doesn't prove anything is "right".

More nonsense .. do you ever say anything that makes any sense and is
relevant to the topic ?