View Single Post
  #22  
Old January 30th 08 posted to sci.physics.relativity
Dirk Van de moortel
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 15,355
Default GPS CLOCK PARADOX


"snapdragon31" wrote in message ...

[snip]

Yes, there are tons of solutions to the twin paradox but none of them
is a valid solution.
Let me show you why it is a logical problem that has no solution.
Assuming that Lorentz transformation can predict the time and distance
of the other frame.
Let v = velocity of the moving twin M
x = distance measured by stationary twin S
t = time measured by twin S
x' = distance measured by twin M
t' = time measured by twin M

The information we have is:
1. v - velocity of moving twin.
2. x = v * t


This equation is valid for events satisfying
x' = 0,
expressing the fact that is the velocity of the origin of
the primed system is v w.r.t. the unprimed system

3. x' = v * t'


Expressing the (erroneous) fact that is the velocity of
the origin of the unprimed system is *also* v w.r.t.
the primed system. That is wrong. The velocity is -v
This is your first error.

4. x' = x * sqrt(1 - v^2/c^2)


Only valid for events satifying
t' = 0
Exercise: Why?

5. t' = t * sqrt(1 - v^2/c^2)


Only valid for events satisfying
x' = 0
Exercise: Why?

So if you combine equations 4 and 5, you are talking about
events that satisfy
x' = 0
t' = 0
and therefore also
x = 0
t = 0
Exercise: Why?

Congratulations.


I hate equations.


Of course you hate equations.
You understand nothing about these equations.
Before you write an equation, you should understand what
the variables mean.
Physics is not an exercise in algebra.
As I told you before, *that* is your problem.

Dirk Vdm
Ads
 

Mortgage - Mobile Phone - Loan - Mortgages - Web Hosting