"PD" wrote in message
...
On Jan 28, 2:53 pm, Koobee Wublee wrote:
On Jan 28, 7:50 am, Michael Helland wrote:

I noticed most of the anti-relativists get insulting on the personal
level with Einstein and usually anyone that accepts relativity.

What do you mean 'insulting Einstein'? Do you not know he was long
dead? Describing anything about Einstein other than using the words
like 'nitwit', 'plagiarist', and 'liar' would be guilty of lying. To
me, it is you who is offended by that because you worship that nitwit,
that plagiarist, that liar as a demi-god. shrug

| We've already established that you do not understand and/or do not
| care for the criteria by which scientific accomplishments are
| credited. That's fine. You're not a scientist, and whether you
| understand or endorse those criteria are wholly irrelevant.

| Likewise, you do not understand and/or do not care for the role of
| physical principles vs mathematical tools in physical theories. Again,
| what you think about these is wholly irrelevant, since you are coming
| from a position of ignorance.

| Furthermore, you do not understand and/or do not agree with the
| foundational statements of both SR and GR, and insist on inserting
| your own statements. It's not a surprise that your own miscasting of
| those statements is wholly irrelevant to both SR and GR.

Talking to yourself again?




Are there any anti-relativists who respect Einstein and the theories?

What do you mean 'respect theories'? I have taken the time to
thoroughly study both SR and GR where both have nothing to do with
Einstein except were named so by him. What I have discovered if I
don' label both SR and GR as absurd conjectures, I would be guilty of
lying. The hypotheses of both SR and GR are utterly nonsense but fun
to learn though.