On Jan 28, 2:53*pm, Koobee Wublee wrote:
On Jan 28, 7:50 am, Michael Helland wrote:

I noticed most of the anti-relativists get insulting on the personal
level with Einstein and usually anyone that accepts relativity.

What do you mean 'insulting Einstein'? *Do you not know he was long
dead? *Describing anything about Einstein other than using the words
like 'nitwit', 'plagiarist', and 'liar' would be guilty of lying. *To
me, it is you who is offended by that because you worship that nitwit,
that plagiarist, that liar as a demi-god. *shrug

We've already established that you do not understand and/or do not
care for the criteria by which scientific accomplishments are
credited. That's fine. You're not a scientist, and whether you
understand or endorse those criteria are wholly irrelevant.

Likewise, you do not understand and/or do not care for the role of
physical principles vs mathematical tools in physical theories. Again,
what you think about these is wholly irrelevant, since you are coming
from a position of ignorance.

Furthermore, you do not understand and/or do not agree with the
foundational statements of both SR and GR, and insist on inserting
your own statements. It's not a surprise that your own miscasting of
those statements is wholly irrelevant to both SR and GR.


Are there any anti-relativists who respect Einstein and the theories?

What do you mean 'respect theories'? *I have taken the time to
thoroughly study both SR and GR where both have nothing to do with
Einstein except were named so by him. *What I have discovered if I
don' label both SR and GR as absurd conjectures, I would be guilty of
lying. *The hypotheses of both SR and GR are utterly nonsense but fun
to learn though.