In sci.physics.relativity, Ockham

wrote
on Sat, 26 Jan 2008 21:30:13 GMT
:

"The Ghost In The Machine" wrote in message
news | In sci.physics.relativity, Ockham
|
| wrote
| on Sat, 26 Jan 2008 18:55:29 GMT
| :
|
| "The Ghost In The Machine" wrote in
message
| ...
| | In sci.physics.relativity, Ockham
| |
| | wrote
| | on Sat, 26 Jan 2008 08:57:36 GMT
| | :
| |
| | "Tom Roberts" wrote in message
| | ...
| | | Peri of Pera wrote:
| | | The Reason for Time Dilation
| | | [...]
| | |
| | | Things are rather more complicated.
| | Things are rather more simple, and you are rather more
simple-minded.
| |
| |
| | And the postulates of a logical theory are ... ?
| |
| | We know the three postulates of SR (two of which are
| | explicitly stated, the third of which is usually stated
| | as a definition):
| |
| | 1. Invariant lightspeed.
| | 2. The same physical laws/rules/properties apply to
| | all inertial reference frames.
| | 3. In a TWLS (A to B) with the second mirror (B) moving,
| | the light takes the same amount of time
| | traveling from A to B as it does traveling
| | from B to A, as observed by A.[*]
| |
| | Since SR is clearly "wrong", according to you, I want to
| | know what is "right".
| |
| |[*] B has a slightly different opinion but can't observe
| | directly the A - B path anyway.
| |
| Those are the three postulates of an illogical theory.
| If the time for light to travel from A to B is t and the time
| for light to travel to B from A is t' then t=t'.
|
|
| I want to know what the postulates are for a logical theory.

What theory would you like?
Evolution?
Plate tectonics?
Kreb's Cycle?
Recombinant DNA?


A theory on light's propagation.

--
#191,
"640K ought to be enough for anybody."
- allegedly said by Bill Gates, 1981, but somebody had to make this up!

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com