On Thu, 8 Jul 2004 21:48:18 GMT, (Andr? Michaud)
wrote:

(Carlos L) wrote in message ...
Although I am aware that there are many authors that claim to have
explained the anomaly using orthodox Physics I nevertheless ask again
for comments to my non-orthodox explanation that received no comments
when I posted it (except the typical barking from Uncle Al that I
always ignore). This is the URL:

oogle.com

Spud

Best regards
Carlos L.

I had a look.

Here is my comment. It is pretty well established without any
doubt that the speed of light of photons is invariant in vacuum
and completely independant of the velocity of the source, which
is precisely why Doppler ranging can be used at all.

As for the doppler data, if it were not to be trusted in this case,
this would make this case the only one on record where Doppler data
would be found not to be totally precise.

To my knowledge, all cases where verification by other means could
be used, the precision cannot be questioned.

When orthodox theories can't explain some phenomenon, it is common
practice to distrust and finally discard the data as being tainted.

Nothin new under the Sun.

André Michaud

[Mod. note: quoted text trimmed -- mjh]
I have the explanation for the Pioneer 10 anomaly as Ch. 13 of my Dual
Space book. It requires a new law of gravity and new physics.
Relativity has no chance of dealing with it. It can't be explained in
a few sentences. It needs the whole Dual Space theory. It's real
alright.

Mr. Dual Space
(If you have something to say, write an equation.
If you have nothing to say, write an essay).