"Dr. Henri Wilson" HW@.... wrote in message
...
On Mon, 21 Jan 2008 10:16:22 +1100, "Jeckyl" wrote:
No . .that would be YOUR explanation that only gives a non-null result if
the source moves and the detector is fixed .. which is not even Sagnac.
You
ever said that all you are analysing is how the light arrives at a fixed
point in the inertial frame and you did not care about how light arrived
at
the detector. That is absolutely hilarious !!!

You are talking crap again.

I'm talking about your explanation ,so of course I'm talking about crap.
And what I say is exactly what you do in your so-called explanation.