On Thu, 3 Jan 2008 11:52:53 -0800 (PST), PD
wrote:

On Jan 3, 1:35*pm, Traveler wrote:
On Thu, 3 Jan 2008 10:39:01 -0800 (PST), PD





wrote:
On Jan 3, 10:19 am, Traveler wrote:
On Tue, 1 Jan 2008 22:46:44 -0800 (PST), malibu

wrote:
If you can't explain *it to a 10 year-old, you
don't know it.

This is so true. To answer the original poster's question:

What is repulsing protons and electrons?

Nothing, IMO. As the electrons in an atom oscillate back and forth,
they go right through the nucleus. These oscilations are responsible
for the charateristic EM spectrum of the atom. The traditional
orbiting model of the atom is hogwash, IMO.

Of course, in your model, the hydrogen atom would radiate all the
time, while the electron oscillates back and forth. This would quickly
run into a problem with energy conservation, but never mind.

What would you say about that, Louis?

[wait for it... * wait for it... * ]

ahahaha... Normally, I would just ridicule your nonsense but, I got to
admit that this time you actually said something intelligent worthy of
a reply. ahahaha... Conventional physics "solves" the energy
conservation problem by appealing to voodoo physics, i.e., to
non-energetic virtual photons. Why? Because they don't have a clue.
Why don't they have a clue? Because they are dishonest and gutless ass
kissers, that's why. ahahaha...

They cannot bring themselves (Paul Dirac was the main exception and
they ignored his suggestions) to admit that we move around in a sea of
energy. If they did, they would be placing themselves against the
edicts of Emepror Einstein who insisted that there's nothing out there
but empty space that can nevertheless curve. ahahaha... What a joke!

To answer your question, the energy comes from a multi-dimensional
highly energetic lattice of real photons in which we move. This
lattice is responsible for the so-called "self-energy" of the electron
(the electrostatic field) and the magnetic field. It is also
indirectly responsible for gravity but that's different story.
However, more than anything else, the lattice is the causal energy
that keeps moving objects in motion. Without it, nothing would move.
But I'm sure that will go over your head, PD. Pfffft!! ahahaha...

So you're saying that 1) energy is NOT conserved, and that 2) hydrogen
atoms radiate continually, because the electrons are oscillating
continually. Right? I just wanted to be sure I've got this down right,
because those seem like very testable predictions of your description.
Those are things you maintain are the case?

You know, you got a bad ****ing habit of seeing things in my posts
that I never wrote. This is the reason that I usually respond to your
comments with a simple "**** you, PD". ahahaha... So I think I'll
continue my time-honored tradition. **** you, PD. And the mule you
sleep with. ahahaha... AHAHAHA... ahahaha...

[snip the rest of your worthless crap]

ahahaha...

Louis Savain

Rebel Science News:
http://rebelscience.blogspot.com/