On Dec 31, 2:20 pm, BURT wrote:
On Dec 30, 5:08 pm, Randy Poe wrote:
On Dec 30, 7:59 pm, BURT wrote:
On Dec 30, 2:42 pm, " wrote:
On Dec 29, 11:25 pm, BURT wrote:
Anti matter could not make it pass the atmosphere in cosmic rays to be
captured by an accelerator. Since it is attractive it would
immediately anihalate with its counterpart. There is the possibility
of 500 quintillion attractive interactions before it reaches the
ground.
The proton and supposed anti proton colliders do not produce what anti
matter theory predicts. When matter is smashed you get more exotic
forms of hadrons but no light. You should get some high energy light
but you don't. This is simply a fact. Antimatter is fake.
Mitch Raemsch -- Light Fell --
Actually Burt, antimatter particles produced by accelerator behave
precisly as predicted. This today is not considered "rocket sceince".
Accelerators don't produce antimatter.
What do you base this declaration on?
Fermi Labs can make 124 billion antiprotons per HOUR.
How?
Apparently you like to just make these random troll declarations
and don't even want to pretend to use Google.
http://agni.phys.iit.edu/~vpa/fnalantiproton.html
"Protons from the Main Injector start the antiproton creation process
by colliding onto a stack of nickel plates called the Target. For
every
1 million protons colliding in these nickel plates, only about 20-30
8
GeV antiprotons are produced"
http://www.iop.org/EJ/abstract/1402-4896/48/2/012
"We measured cross sections for production of antiprotons, K- and đ-
mesons at člab = 0° in nucleus-nucleus collisions for the systems Ne
+
NaF, Ne + Cu, Ne + Sn, Ne + Bi and for Ni + Ni..."
Apparently the proton-on-nickel collision is the most productive
reaction we know, as inefficient as it is (20 antiprotons out
for every million protons in).
- Randy