"Dr. Henri Wilson" HW@.... wrote in message
...
: On Wed, 26 Dec 2007 22:26:19 GMT, "Androcles"
: wrote:
:
:
: "Dr. Henri Wilson" HW@.... wrote in message
: .. .
: : On Wed, 26 Dec 2007 08:08:33 GMT, "Androcles"
:
: : All right! I have an apology to make....and I will make it on the
: condition
: : that you call a unilateral truce.
:
: You can have a truce as soon as you explain how there are
: 14 wavelengths going ccw and 10 going cw in rayphases.exe
: when in fact 12 are emitted in each direction.
: Hint:
:
http://www.androcles01.pwp.blueyonde...k/Dualwave.gif
:
: This shows two identical oscillators moving away from a common point at
: different speeds.
Yep, in the non-rotating frame they do have different speeds, c+v and c-v.
The start point isn't moving. They have identical frequencies, different
speeds and travel different distances in the same time. That's what
a different speed is.
In rayphases.exe your two oscillators have different frequencies, 0.7 Hz
and 0.5 Hz.
If you increase the speed to your fake maximum 0.005 then
there are 18 crests blue, a frequency of 0.9 Hz and 6 red crests,
a frequency of 0.3 Hz.
Look, a kiddy jumping up and down on a bus doesn't change the frequency,
it changes the leap forward along the road as the bus increases speed.
: Their wavelengths are different....
Of course they are different, there are exactly the same number of
them in two different distances, you knee-jerking moron.
(knee jerk, knee jerk)
: as my definition of wavelength states.
Your definition of wavelength is absurd. You are a ****ing idiot.
: You are using the source frame.
WRONG!
That gif is drawn ENTIRELY in the non rotating frame.
In the rotating source frame the cw and ccw wavelengths
are mirrot images of each other, as are the frequencies and
the distances from the source.
: In a sagnac ring, the two identical oscillators move away at the SAME
speed
: 'c'......
Yep.
: so your illustration is not relevant to Sagnac.
You have the wrong frame and YOU are irrelevant, you ****in'
useless loose cannon.
:
: In the frame of an observer moving away from the point at v,
Observers are either in the rotating frame or the non-rotating
frame, they are not "moving away". You are ****in' hopeless.
[garbage snipped]
:
: (24 in each direction)
: Then you can apologise to all the people you've tried to deceive.
:
: This is basically how light behaves in a sagnac ring:
:
http://www.users.bigpond.com/hewn/wheels.exe
Same bull****, different wave shape. The wheels have
different frequencies. If the speed were increased to
your fake 0.01 the kiddy jumping up and down on the bus
wouldn't be able to move, that's ridiculous. You have an
aetherialist's model, not a ballistic one at all, you STOOOPID crank.
:
: You could be useful if you were not a loose cannon on the gun deck,
: firing in all directions.
:
: : You were correct about Sagnac being explainable by the Coriolis effect,
: when
: : analysed in the rotating frame.
:
: Of course I'm correct.
:
:
: tell us all about it then.
: Where's you equation?
Look it up, I gave it to you. shift = d.sin(v/c)
http://www.androcles01.pwp.blueyonde...agnac/RLG1.gif
:
: : You obviously read about it somewhere and probably don't really
understand
: : why...
:
: ****head Wilson is a bull****ting sheep shagging JEALOUS LIAR.
: Just because you lack the intelligence to connect the two, Wilson,
: doesn't make me as stupid as you.
:
: : so I'll give you an opportunity to prove you're not a dopey old *******
: : after all.
:
: No way, it's war between us until YOU surrender. You are up against
: a British bulldog. I've got my teeth in your arse and I'm biting.
:
: You don't frighten me...I suppose you still think Britannia Rules The
Waves.
Don't ask me for a truce, I demand unconditional surrender or war continues.
YOU ARE WRONG!
:
: : Would you please explain to Roberts and Jeckyl the role that Coriolis
: plays in
: : Sagnac. I already know the answer. I worked it out myself.
:
: You thought about it after you read it somewhere and probably still
: don't really understand why, and the only place you read it is in
: MY writings, you JEALOUS *******.
:
: Come on! Tell us all about Coriolis and Sagnac.
I did and its on my web page, you jealous ignorant *******.
http://www.androcles01.pwp.blueyonde...nac/Sagnac.htm
:
: I want YOU to tell Tom why his bullet analogy is wrong.
I don't give a **** what you want. That arsehole is a total
clown anyway.
:
: YOU can tell Fecal Jeckyl, Tusseladd, Jeery and Humpty that *I* am right.
:
: I agree you ARE right....but I doubt if you know why.
You are too late for that, I've already drawn the gifs.
http://www.androcles01.pwp.blueyonde...nac/Sagnac.htm