On Wed, 26 Dec 2007 22:26:19 GMT, "Androcles"
wrote:
"Dr. Henri Wilson" HW@.... wrote in message
.. .
: On Wed, 26 Dec 2007 08:08:33 GMT, "Androcles"
: All right! I have an apology to make....and I will make it on the
condition
: that you call a unilateral truce.
You can have a truce as soon as you explain how there are
14 wavelengths going ccw and 10 going cw in rayphases.exe
when in fact 12 are emitted in each direction.
Hint:
http://www.androcles01.pwp.blueyonde...k/Dualwave.gif
This shows two identical oscillators moving away from a common point at
different speeds. Their wavelengths are different....as my definition of
wavelength states.
You are using the source frame.
In a sagnac ring, the two identical oscillators move away at the SAME speed
'c'......so your illustration is not relevant to Sagnac.
In the frame of an observer moving away from the point at v, the wave speeds
relative to that observer are c+v and c-v and their frequencies are doppler
shifted to f(c+v)/c and f(c-v)/c. Wavelength is (speed/frequency)and, as you
can see, remains the same in both waves.
(24 in each direction)
Then you can apologise to all the people you've tried to deceive.
This is basically how light behaves in a sagnac ring:
http://www.users.bigpond.com/hewn/wheels.exe
You could be useful if you were not a loose cannon on the gun deck,
firing in all directions.
: You were correct about Sagnac being explainable by the Coriolis effect,
when
: analysed in the rotating frame.
Of course I'm correct.
tell us all about it then.
Where's you equation?
: You obviously read about it somewhere and probably don't really understand
: why...
****head Wilson is a bull****ting sheep shagging JEALOUS LIAR.
Just because you lack the intelligence to connect the two, Wilson,
doesn't make me as stupid as you.
: so I'll give you an opportunity to prove you're not a dopey old *******
: after all.
No way, it's war between us until YOU surrender. You are up against
a British bulldog. I've got my teeth in your arse and I'm biting.
You don't frighten me...I suppose you still think Britannia Rules The Waves.
: Would you please explain to Roberts and Jeckyl the role that Coriolis
plays in
: Sagnac. I already know the answer. I worked it out myself.
You thought about it after you read it somewhere and probably still
don't really understand why, and the only place you read it is in
MY writings, you JEALOUS *******.
Come on! Tell us all about Coriolis and Sagnac.
I want YOU to tell Tom why his bullet analogy is wrong.
YOU can tell Fecal Jeckyl, Tusseladd, Jeery and Humpty that *I* am right.
I agree you ARE right....but I doubt if you know why.
Henri Wilson. ASTC,BSc,DSc(T)
www.users.bigpond.com/hewn/index.htm