"Dr. Henri Wilson" HW@.... wrote in message
...
On Wed, 26 Dec 2007 18:26:51 +1100, "Jeckyl" wrote:

"Androcles" wrote in message
o.uk...

"Richard Hachel" wrote in message
...
:
:
: Androcles a écrit :
:
: "Chris" wrote in message
: . uk...
: :I don't think he was wrong, just misunderstood and I don't
understand
it
: : either.
: :
: : The lorenz transform is symmentrical
:
: Ok, that is why you don't understand it. What you have NOT
: done is examined how the "Lorentz Transformations" (which I call
: the cuckoo malformations) came into non-existence.
: The mathematics is in section 3 of
: "On The Electrodynamics of Moving Bodies" by Albert Crazy Einstein,
: and I've explained it he
: http://www.androcles01.pwp.blueyonde...mart/Smart.htm
:
: Bravo Androcles!
:
: If you can read french:
: "L'erreur d'Einstein consiste à croire qu'on peut synchroniser
facilement
: toutes les montres d'un référentiel inertiel, et qu'on peut le
ta****er
: avec des montres
: synchronisées les unes avec les autres pour peu qu'elles soient
fixes.
: Or, non seulement la nature, l'univers, n'est pas fait comme ça, et
donc
: il s'agit d'un postulat faux; mais encore, ce postulat induit une
totale
: absurdité en fin de course: les vitesses apparentes ne peuvent pas
être
: symétriques dans le Langevin.
: Par contre, si l'on admet que la vitesse de la lumière n'est pas la
même
: dans les deux sens pour tous les observateurs (sauf pour un
observateur
: transverse), alors il n'y a plus aucun problème. Cela devient très
: cohérent.
:

Babel fish translation:

"the error of Einstein consists in believing that one can synchronize
easily
all watches of an inertial reference frame, and that one can paper it
with
watches synchronized ones with the others for little which they are
fixed.
However, not only nature, the universe, is not made like that, and thus
it
acts of a false postulate; but still, this postulate induces total
nonsense
in race end apparent speeds cannot be symmetrical in Langevin.

On the other hand, if it is admitted that the speed of the light is not
the
same one in the two directions for all the observers (except for a
transverse observer), then it does not have there more no problem. That
becomes very coherent."
Ok, we can agree on that. Perhaps Mssr. Valev can translate it better
than
Babelfish.
http://babelfish.altavista.com/tr

So .. you are a fixed ether believer then .. where the speed of light
depends on movement relative to a fixed ether and so you get differing
speeds when moving with/against the ether, but not when moving across it?
If not. . what IS you actual position .. its hard to tell .. other than
you
ego-feeding believe that you know better than Einstein and a centuries
worth
of physicists.

Hooray, you finally got something right.
Androcles is indeed a closet aetherist...

When you're right, you're right