"Androcles" wrote in message
o.uk...

"Chris" wrote in message
. uk...
:I don't think he was wrong, just misunderstood and I don't understand it
: either.
:
: The lorenz transform is symmentrical

Ok, that is why you don't understand it.

You think it isn't symmetrical? That the LT is its own inverse?

What you have NOT
done is examined how the "Lorentz Transformations" (which I call
the cuckoo malformations)

Which, as you are a prime example of a cuckoo, means nothing.

came into non-existence.
The mathematics is in section 3 of
"On The Electrodynamics of Moving Bodies" by Albert Crazy Einstein,
and I've explained it he
http://www.androcles01.pwp.blueyonde...mart/Smart.htm

Your silly animation does NOT show what AE's definition means at all. He
says that in a given single frame of reference, in which A and B are at
rest, the time taken for light to go from A to B is the same as B to A, and
that if their clocks show this, then their clocks are in sync (and vice
versa).

You say "Gee, I hope I didn't make any errors, I so much want to understand
relativity."

That, of course, is a lie. You don't want to understand. You want Einstein
(and a century's worth of physicists) to be wrong and so you deliberately
misunderstand to make it so. Just so you can feed your own ego. Sad.