On Tue, 27 Nov 2007 07:03:30 -0800 (PST), kenseto
wrote:

Doppler Shift is evidence for the varying speed of incoming light.
This statement is based on the following assumptions:
1. The wavelength of a source such as the sodium is a defined
universal constant 589 nm in all frames.

Which is obviously not true, but don't let that stop you from assuming
it anyway.

2. There is nothing that can change the universal wavelength of sodium
during the transit of sodium light from a moving sodium source.

Except doppler shift, gravitational redshift, or expansion of the
universe. Don't let reality determine what is and isn't true, Ken!

3. The incoming light from a moving sodium source becomes a new light
source in the observer's frame. The grating in the observer's frame
defines a new wavelength for this new light source....much like the
grating defines different wavelengths for different light sources in
the observer's frame.

I swear someone explained the concept of the diffraction grating to
you before.

4. The newly defined wavelength for the incoming light can be used to
identify the original source (sodium) of the incoming light as
outlined in the following previous post by PD.

For ****s sake, Ken. Nobody uses "newly defined "wavelength" except
you, in your head.


Based on the above assumptions the varying speed of the incoming
sodium light is calculated as follows:
c' = (the measured incoming frequency of incoming sodium light)(589 nm
universal wavelength for sodium light)

Unsupported by observation, dumbass. Higher frequency light would
arrive more quickly than lower frequency light, which isn't observed.


The above interpretation on the varying speed of incoming sodium light
gives rise to a new theory of relativity called Improved Relativity
Theory (IRT). IRT includes SRT as a subset. However, unlike SRT, the
equations of IRT are valid in all environments, including grvaity. IRT
is described in a paper entitled "Improved Relativity Theory and
Doppler Theory of Gravity" in my website:
http://www.geocities.com/kn_seto/index.htm

Ken Seto

You sure are quick to toot your own horn even though you can't show
something simple like how gravitational time dilation appears from
your theory.

You can't explain what is already observed, much less make new
predictions.

[snip remaining]