On Mon, 29 Oct 2007 17:53:12 -0700, kevirwin
wrote:

On Oct 29, 11:37 am, Al Klein wrote:

You write *a lot* of missives to yourself?

Try "reading up" on "intelligence" first.


Well Mr. Al,

You wrote that witless retort because:

(A) you're really Uncle Al under another uninspired alias

What a load of utter bull****!
You are an ignoramus on the subject.
You have libelled two sincere and earnest posters.
(With no more reason than that they have the letter string "Al" in
their handles)

(B) you have developed an unnatural affinity to persons named "Al"

Oh, Grow up.

And do some actual research before you accuse a real person, who posts
with their REAL name of impersonation.
Grow a ****ing backbone before casting stones.
After that: grow a cerebral cortex.
After that: Use it.
What is your real name?

(C) your rejoinder passes for high wit on science forums and atheist's
forums

Perhaps it *is* wit?
Or is it that atheist's fora are beyond you intellectually?

(D) you missed my veiled reference to the unnecessary ad hominems
Uncle Al loosed upon an unsuspecting seeker of knowledge

Read minds now, do you?
How extraordinary!
Can you read my mind now?
Here's a test :
I think that you are a .......

Fill in the missing word.

(E) you wished to engage in verbal sparring in an arena where you're
the under dog

WTF?

(F) _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ (write-in)

WTF?

If it's (E), sorry...I'm not interested, I like a challenge...
I studied intelligence a long time ago; I'm in the top 2%. I just
don't give a **** about physics, nor the endless atheist-theist
arguments.

Christ almighty, you are FULL OF YOURSELF, aren't you, you friggin'
arrogant arsehole PRICK?????

Show me the test results, oh please wondrous master.
The ones that showed that you are in the top 2% of those who have
STUDIED intelligence, whatever the **** that may mean, (not those who
are in the top 2% of the intelligent, that is, as it is perfectly
plain that you are nothing of the sort.)

My view (added unnecessarily) on scientific method/discovery:

(1) Have an epiphany of scientific wonder
(2) Develop hypothesis
(3) Test hypothesis
(4) (a) Upon failure of test, discard theory, destroying all data on
failure and return to step (1)
(b) upon accidental and fortuitous affirmation, notify like-
minded individuals and bask in glory
Even a blind squirrel finds an acorn every once in awhile

If I failed to offend anyone in the three cross-posted forums (I've
already offended most people in alt.p), feel free to e-mail me for
further scathing, sardonic (and probably misunderstood) abuse, as
required..

I'm done in this ****ing thread...

At least you can recognize when you are intellectually defeated.
But your egotistically unkempt kind cannot help but go back on their
solemn word.
I await your unpromised response with an odd mixture of some boredom,
and some loathing.

peace out y'all,

Liar.'

K e v
friend to one and all,

Liar.