born-again (and never,again,born-again) Semites expose Bradley's hoax:
he's still using Ptolemy's "missing epicycle" for his daily horoscope;
waiting for the *next* Age of Aquarius in the JPL simulation?
seriously, unmanned probes are as bad as your SIMsuit;
how will we know if *any* one has any space program,
including ourselves?... unless, you can stimulate the hard suctioning
sensation
of interplanetary space -- not to be confuzed with The Vacuum --
this could be more serious than the classical dichotomy
between the un-fried chicken & the un-soft-boiled egg!
I always get scared, when I can't see Venus --
do you have her phone# !?!
if she walks like a junglefowl,
she tastes like gamey chicken, but
you sitll have to break the eggs
to make the omelette.
(compared to what will be possible in the future, that is).
Apparently it's so simple that you silly folks haven't a freaking clue
as to the required fly-by-rocket physics, the necessary protection of
our frail DNA, or the subsequent science that should have been easily
obtained.
thus:
anyway, since the Apollo landings were not near lunar sunrise or
sunset, how could Venus be visible, without occultation
of Sun by Moon --
*why* is it called the morningstar?
thus:
in night-time photos of "foreground" objects, without specialized
printing;
the foreground stuff is "orders of magnitude" brigther
than those tiny pinpoints of light.
why don't you try to get out of your chair, and
try to take some actual pictures of actual sky-stuff,
that you can see with your naked eye.
as you may know, though I'm not sure about this,
not even a near-quarter Moon is always visible close to noontime,
if it is "out," at all;
kind of limits your viewing opportunites of Venus;
doesn't it?... most newspapers print the sun & moon "rise" and "set"
times;
should they print Venus's two, just for you?
the proof is in the nude Kodak moments,
where the astronauts are sunbathing in the Mojave moviesetting,
a pile of spacesuits to the side.
thus:
as for Pons and Fleischman,
their results have been replicated all over the planet, and
many more besides, although I don't know of a complete theory, yet,
nor do I follow the field. unfortunately, a percieved conflict
with the hot fusion community crushed any USA funding,
at least til recently.
the calorimetric approach precludes the "storing-up
of energy as hydrogen in the electrodes," because
you still have to account for the energy to split the water. golly,
what is so problematic about the idea of fusion being catalyzed
within a metallic lattice -- how do you explain the excess heat and
nuclear products?
* or, it was just too recondite & special of a solution
--wasn't it a rotating cylindrical universe?-- to require an answer.
thus:
the basic problem is that you muzlimfizikists believe that
those planes were not big-enough bombs to topple Earth's
tallest, most-highly-balanced structures. please,
look at the MIT head welder's analysis,
before you commit to this ideal.
http://larouchepub.com/other/2007/34...onspiracy.html
http://larouchepub.com/other/2007/34...st_cheney.html
thus:
re
http://data.giss.nasa.gov/gistemp/graphs/Fig.D.txt
why do people believe that
the cartels do not love the Kyoto Protocol, or that
they are against their own statistical data,
known as Peak Oil --
what's missing in the gestalt, here?...
the glacier data that mosnieur Croppock linked,
is completely selective, as you can
tell by reading the encyclopedia-like article;
these glaciers are the ones
that are readily accessible!
http://nsidc.org/sotc/glacier_balance.html
thus quoth:
Only fragments of these remarks have been reported in the West, while
in Russia RIA Novosti gave its readers a headline
("Clinton supports placement of BMD in Poland and the Czech
Republic")
that was directly opposite to what President Clinton said.
http://larouchepub.com/other/2007/34..._at_yalta.html
--n~nerfman~n!
http://larouchepub.com/pr/2007/07073...each_dick.html
14 Italian Senators Call for Cheney Impeachment
Aug. 1, 2007 (EIRNS)-
The Lyndon LaRouche Political Action Committee
(LPAC) issued the following release today.
Fourteen members of the Italian Senate have signed a call "to the
Members of Congress to support Rep. Kucinich's House Resolution 333
for the Impeachment of Dick Cheney."
http://larouchepub.com/pr/2007/07080...tors_call.html